Building Block: AI Can Speed Up Hiring. Don’t Let It Rush the Decision

AI is making hiring faster.

It can screen resumes, summarize interviews, identify skills, generate interview questions, and compare candidates in seconds.

That’s useful.

But there’s an important distinction between speeding up the hiring process and speeding up the hiring decision.

I’ve made enough hiring decisions over the years to know the difference.

When you’re short-handed, an open position feels like a problem that needs to be solved immediately. A candidate checks most of the boxes, everyone is busy, and it’s tempting to say, “Good enough.”

That’s usually when trouble starts.

AI can help us gather and organize more information about candidates. It can’t determine whether someone will take ownership when things go wrong, work well with your team, earn a client’s trust, or live your company’s values when nobody is watching.

Those things still require human judgment.

Use AI to eliminate administrative work. Use it to prepare better questions. Use it to make your hiring process more thorough and efficient.

Then slow down for the part that matters most: deciding who joins your team.

Getting the right person a week later is almost always better than getting the wrong person tomorrow.

Building Block: Hiring Slowly Is Still Good Business

In The 100: Building Blocks for Business Leadership, I wrote about a lesson I’d learned the hard way:

“Avoid hasty hires.”

I noted that when we’ve justified hiring someone because of an especially heavy workload, that person might provide short-term relief but fail to work out over the long term. The lesson was simple: take the time to thoroughly evaluate someone before inviting them onto your team.

A decade later, technology has dramatically changed hiring.

The principle hasn’t.

Let AI make the process faster.

Don’t let it make you impatient.

Building Block: Hiring Slowly Pays Dividends

In today’s talent market, many companies feel pressure to hire quickly.

That’s often a mistake.

A bad hire doesn’t just cost recruiting fees. It costs productivity, morale, customer relationships, and management attention.

The best organizations I’ve seen are patient. They know that waiting another month for the right person is almost always less expensive than spending a year managing the wrong one.

AI can screen resumes faster than ever. It can summarize interviews, compare candidates, and even identify potential skills gaps.

But AI can’t tell you whether someone shares your values.

Culture still matters.

Skills can be developed.

Character is much harder to teach.

The companies that win over the long run aren’t simply filling positions.

They’re building teams.

Hiring for Curiosity, Ownership & Adaptability: How We Assess the 3 Traits That Matter Most

At Intertech, we’ve made a conscious shift in how we hire. While technical skills still matter, they’re no longer enough. The how behind the what—how a consultant thinks, adapts, and leads—is the true differentiator.

So how do we identify candidates who demonstrate curiosity, ownership, and adaptability? Here’s a look under the hood.


1. Curiosity

Look for the why-askers.

Interview Signal:
We ask candidates to walk through a complex past project and pause halfway through. Then we throw them a twist—“What if the client had changed direction at this point?” or “What if a key assumption was wrong?”

What we’re watching for:
Do they instinctively ask clarifying questions before answering? Do they seek to understand the business context or user goals? Curious minds don’t rush—they explore.


2. Ownership

Listen for stories where they took the wheel.

Interview Signal:
We prompt candidates with this:
“Tell me about a time when something went wrong and it wasn’t technically your fault, but you stepped in anyway.”

What we’re watching for:
Do they shift blame or step up? Ownership doesn’t mean perfection—it means being accountable when it counts.


3. Adaptability

Throw them a curveball—on purpose.

Interview Signal:
We often introduce a challenge mid-interview:
“Let’s imagine your tech stack suddenly changed. How would you re-approach the problem?”

What we’re watching for:
Are they flustered or open-minded? Do they pivot with poise or dig in defensively?


Bonus: We Talk Less, Listen More

Our interviews are structured to minimize talking and maximize listening. When candidates tell real, unscripted stories—especially about failures or pivots—that’s where the gold lives.


Why This Approach Works

When clients choose Intertech, they’re trusting us with big goals and big expectations. By hiring consultants who are naturally curious, take ownership, and adapt quickly, we stack the deck in everyone’s favor—ours, theirs, and yours.

Hiring Top Performers, an Interview Guide

We are hiring.  Getting the right people is vital, obviously, to building a great team.

Building a great team starts with finding great people. Top firms spend an excessive amount of time recruiting.

One worldwide executive recruiting firm, Egon Zehnder International, conducts between 25 and 40 interviews per hire!  Most of us don’t have the time or resources to put job candidates through such a rigorous recruiting process. However, we can take the time to check out a potential new employee thoroughly before asking him or her to join our team. If you’re wowed by someone’s technical prowess but concerned about his or her honesty or attitude, don’t risk it. When we have justified hiring someone—usually in response to a hefty workload—the person may have provided short-term relief but did not work out in the long term.

We have an eight-step process. An essential step in our approach uses an interview from the book Top Grading.  Here’s a link to that interview.

20 top tech companies hiring in Minneapolis

Minneapolis/St. Paul is the 6th best place to live in the U.S. by US News and 6th best job market by Indeed.

In the article below, Intertech was honored to be featured as one of the top tech employers in MN.

https://www.beseen.com/blog/talent/tech-companies-in-minneapolis/