Effective Public Engagement – 10 Guidelines

The-WhitehouseAs I mentioned in my previous post, Fighting a Government Threat is both an academic case study topic in the March 2013 issue of Harvard Business Review and is a subject that is quite personal for my company. In this and several upcoming posts I will share lessons learned from my own engagement with governmental leaders, as well as recommendations from the HBR case study of the same title.  So, without further adieu, here are my Top 10 Rules for Effective Public Engagement:

 

 

 

  1. Pay close attention to the issues and government proposals before they become laws!
  2. Seek to understand both sides of the issue so you can provide a reasonable, balanced perspective.
  3. Work to document your company’s contribution to the local community.
  4. Engage your employees in the public debate as much as possible.
  5. Don’t be afraid to take a position and speak out about it.
  6. Don’t make idle threats.
  7. Try to offer reasonable ideas/counter proposals that both parties can live with.
  8. Don’t assume that your counterpart thinks the way you do or is influenced by the same consideration.
  9. Work to find points of convergence and show empathy for the goals of the Governor or legislators with whom you have a disagreement.
  10. Build a positive relationship with the news media over time.

Next post I will take a closer look at items 1-3.

Effective Public Engagement

Little-Dog-Big-TeethMounting debt, increasing costs and a shrinking tax base have left many leaders at all governmental levels struggling to balance budgets and maintain service levels expected by constituents. Unfortunately, many politicians push tax increases as an almost knee-jerk solution, ignoring the negative impact higher taxes may have on businesses and consumers alike.

A recent case study in Harvard Business Review (HBR) entitled Fighting a Government Threat takes a close look at this scenario and provides commentary by Andrzej Klesyk, CEO of PZU Group and Michael Hartman, senior vice president of legal and regulatory affairs, DirectTV Latin America. The HBR article and commentary combined with the recent debate in Minnesota over the Governor’s proposed tax on business-to-business services, has inspired me to write a series of posts on the topic of Effective Public Engagement.

As you undoubtedly know, Governor Dayton’s proposed B2B tax ignited a firestorm in the local business community and, ultimately, the Governor chose to withdraw his proposal. I appreciate his willingness to listen and respond to the sincere concerns of small- and medium-sized business owners, as well as the CEOs of Minnesota’s largest companies, all of whom weighed in on this hot topic. I was among those participating in the debate and was gratified when the Star Tribune chose to publish my OpEd on the topic Taxing business services is bad for Minnesota.  I also was quoted in a related column by Star Tribune reporter Neal St. Anthony.

What can businesses like mine learn from this recent episode? There are a number of lessons, which I will share in my next few posts on this topic. Some are drawn from the HBR case study I referenced above and others are based on my own legislative debate experiences. I hope you will weigh in with your thoughts, questions and recommendations too!

Up next… 10 rules for effective public engagement.

Creativity Article Generates Feedback from HBR Readers… What Do You Think?

Business-Person-BullhornI noticed this month’s Harvard Business Review (March 2012) devoted two pages to reader comments on the article “Creativity as an Exercise in Self-Discovery.” Since I spent quite a few posts responding to that article, I thought you might be interested in how other people responded to it as well. I’m also hoping some of you will get inspired to share your own ideas about this topic too!

Is the world really divided into “creatives” and “noncreatives?” Maybe not, but many people still deem themselves unimaginative. The authors (Tom Kelley and David Kelley), both leaders at the design and innovation consulting firm IDEO, have discovered that “teaching” creativity is really a matter of helping people find the courage to tap into the “creative confidence” they already possess. (HBR, March 2013, p. 16).

Reader responses:

“The authors’ finding that they help people unblock creativity instead of “causing” it parallels my own research on how to get people to take personal responsibility for social problems. From picking up a candy wrapper on the sidewalk to organizing a political movement, the first step is to stop blocking people’s natural inclinations. When people take on a social problem, we tend to question their motives, for example. We accuse them of being self-righteous or holier-than-thou. It would be interesting to look at how we block the creativity of others in this way.” –Earl Babble, Campbell Professor Emeritus in Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University

“As they explained, the article’s examples are cases less of creativity than of pragmatism. Trial and error produces a better product over time, for example. We do not create so much as we discover for ourselves those things that previously existed. The ability of an individual to discover the same form of something in a different context is about the best we can hope for.” –Shawn Williamson, doctoral student, Claremont Graduate University

“It’s all about how long you can hold your breath. If you work right up against the deadline, the pressure can start to work for you and get the creative energy going.” – Graham Robertson, president, Beloved Brands

“Society’s perception of ‘creative people’ as only publicly imaginative or artistic individuals kills the self-confidence of engineers like me—logic-oriented people who try to be creative at work. Anyone can come up with original, elegant solutions if he or she (1) is knowledgeable about the situation at hand, (2) is comfortable enough to let the brain be flexible, (3) has the passion to spend time solving problems using his or her own solutions, not the common ones. We should talk about creativity in more pragmatic ways, not always referring to games, the arts, and spatial activities.” –Farnaz Motamediyan, researcher, Volvo Construction Equipment

“Can it be that innovation, in this context, is just a series of applications executed in a commonsensical way that works? Take two pieces of bread with a slice of ham on top instead of in the middle—it’s still a ham sandwich. Is that innovative?” –Arindom Borah, freelance consultant, water supply and treatment industry

“Imagine a world where everyone trusted his own creative confidence enough to allow old and unnecessary systems to fall away, knowing we could readily create a better way.” –Becky Blades, founder, Staristry

“Is it true that children who like solving puzzles become creative and innovative adults? I have observed this in my children. They always find something out of the ordinary to do.” –Charles Kaluwasha, consultant, ROI Travel Network

“My ability to come up with creative solutions has been developed through hands-on experience, and I would rather sit at a table with a group of 15 people speaking at once, trying to gain a single sentence of substance, than to sit in silence.” – Rosemary Braun, business development manager, Cisco Systems

Hope those letters spurred a few thoughts of your own. If so, please don’t be shy about sharing them here!

My next series of posts will look at the issue of “issues.” Specifically, how people in business can constructively engage in the public forum on issues of importance to their organizations.

Reclaim Your Creative Confidence: Fear of Losing Control

Totally-Losing-ControlFew of us are creative in a vacuum. We need other people to help spur our thinking, test our ideas and give us feedback. Yet, involving others does mean letting go of at least some control. Notes David Kelley and Tom Kelley (K&K) in the article “Reclaim Your Creative Confidence” (HBR 12/12):

“When you abandon the status quo and work collaboratively, you sacrifice control over your product, your team and your business. But the creative gains can more than compensate.”

I heartily agree.

That philosophy is at heart of how we run Intertech, from the town hall meetings in which our employees give candid feedback and ideas, to our annual partner planning retreat, to meetings with customers, to FedEx Days — we constantly seek fresh ideas, input and new approaches. These steps, taken consistently and according to an overall management strategy, may sound a little plodding and not fit your idea of “creative,” but I respectfully disagree. As the Hungarian essayist Grorgy Konrad once said (as referenced by K&K),

“Courage is only the accumulation of small steps.”

And it takes courage to be creative!

If you’re a leader, it takes even more courage. As I’ve noted in previous posts, leaders must consciously cultivate a work environment that allows employees to take risks, test ideas and, yes, occasionally fail. But if we can do that, we have a much better chance of exceeding expectations and succeeding in spectacular fashion.

Creativity, after all, is not a formula.